lapack error again!

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: lapack error again!
• From: Globe Trotter <itsme_410@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wfavdvpJFz6wOnvv7rl9XjXhLN38NxJiG5qJbkXc2xjKDfEWB6pkfas71ZhBmIbmCMjUKyyFlOGrQXrTfG231Pvw5dE3giBip+8Bi+B+r8oKhuG4z+hpzRlY0AQKwqJYMIxelqqMlIp0CAuCw1QPjyUcGpxp1AJ2+QkXtWpyok4= ;
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

It appears that the new version of lapack (after, but not including 3.0.28)
creates an error. In particular, dgesvdd has problems and the recommended
minimal memory allocation for LWORK is not liked:

 ** On entry to DGESDD parameter number 12 had an illegal value

Any suggestions?

Many thanks!


		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com

• Prev by Date: Fwd: [Contributors] Microsoft Windows Is Offically Broken
• Next by Date: Re: Fwd: [Contributors] Microsoft Windows Is Offically Broken
• Previous by thread: Fwd: [Contributors] Microsoft Windows Is Offically Broken
• Next by thread: Fedora and MD5
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread