Re: making the src.rpms generally.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Sa, den 10.09.2005 schrieb Strong um 17:21:

> Why after gcc-c++, libstc++ and libstdc++-devel update, the src.rpms fail when are compiled?
> That's what i get:
> ...
> checking for dlfcn.h... yes
> checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-g++... no
> checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-c++... no
> checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-gpp... no
> checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-aCC... no
> checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-CC... no
> checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-cxx... no
> checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-cc++... no
> checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-cl... no
> checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-FCC... no
> checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-KCC... no
> checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-RCC... no
> checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-xlC_r... no
> checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-xlC... no
> checking for g++... g++
> checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
> checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
> checking dependency style of g++... gcc3
> checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /lib/cpp
> configure: error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check
> See `config.log' for more details.

Check that config.log file.

> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.70505 (%build)

I don't know what answer you expect.

> Strong.

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp 
Serendipity 17:42:57 up 19 days, 14:26, load average: 0.28, 0.24, 0.24 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux