I guess they just stayed true to their word in FC 4. :p Thanks for the responses. On 9/4/05, Charles E. Rick Taylor, IV <charletiv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 07:52 -0700, oldman wrote: > > [Installing FC in 96M] > > > The release notes of every FC distro clearly states: > > > > 3.3. Memory Requirements > > Minimum for graphical: 192MB > > Of course, that "minimum" may not be the actual minimum. I think the > same was said in FC3's release notes, but I needed to get a FC install > (FC3, in this case, due to lingering problems with FC4 on this piece of > hardware) onto a Thinkpad 770X which stubbornly refused to boot with > known good install CDs. So I pulled out an old Thinkpad 380XD > (P233/96M) and installed FC3 onto that, then transferred the hard drive > back to the 770X. > > The only thing was - without thinking I selected "graphical install". > The installer didn't complain a bit about only having 96M of RAM, and > the install went without a hitch. > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > * Charles E. "Rick" Taylor, IV <charletiv@xxxxxxxxx> > * ( Formerly tomalek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ) > * Chemistry instructor / Mad scientist / Linux enthusiast > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > * Web: http://www.rickandpatty.com > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list >
