Re: kernel 2.6.12-1.1376_FC3 without kernel-devel?

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: kernel 2.6.12-1.1376_FC3 without kernel-devel?
• From: Peter Boy <pboy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 01:31:49 +0200
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• Organization: University of Bremen
• References: <1125304379.5154.17.camel@littlePiet> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Am Montag, den 29.08.2005, 16:16 -0400 schrieb Dave Jones:
> Yes. Concensus was reached that the (accidental) changeover
> in the previous update caused lots of problems for the
> maintainers of out-of-tree modules, so I switched it back.
> 
> 		Dave
> 
Thanks for information. I just got used to the new way, but .... I
appreciate the decision.


Peter

• References:
  • kernel 2.6.12-1.1376_FC3 without kernel-devel?
    • From: Peter Boy
  • Re: kernel 2.6.12-1.1376_FC3 without kernel-devel?
    • From: Dave Jones

• Prev by Date: Re: I need help with LDAP and Evolution
• Next by Date: Re: FC4 Ready for primt time?
• Previous by thread: Re: kernel 2.6.12-1.1376_FC3 without kernel-devel?
• Next by thread: No public key available and yum
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread