Re: SELinux and Squid - Non-default squid http_port (!=3128)

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SELinux and Squid - Non-default squid http_port (!=3128)
From: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 08:35:45 +0530
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050512 Red Hat/1.7.8-1.1.3.1

Thomas Springer wrote:

=== Date : Sun, 28 Aug 2005 08:11:44 +0530
=== From : Rahul Sundaram

So you should prefer the 2nd boolean just like Rahul said it.
I dunno why they are called differently.

What is being called differently?

regards
Rahul


1st
Securitylevel/SELinux/Others
Boolean : squid_allow_any

Seems to be "squid_connect_any" on both to me

regards
Rahul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SELinux and Squid - Non-default squid http_port (!=3128)
  - From: Thomas Springer

References:
- SELinux and Squid - Non-default squid http_port (!=3128)
  - From: Øyvind Stegard
- Re: SELinux and Squid - Non-default squid http_port (!=3128)
  - From: Thomas Springer
- Re: SELinux and Squid - Non-default squid http_port (!=3128)
  - From: Øyvind Stegard
- Re: SELinux and Squid - Non-default squid http_port (!=3128)
  - From: Thomas Springer
- Re: SELinux and Squid - Non-default squid http_port (!=3128)
  - From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: SELinux and Squid - Non-default squid http_port (!=3128)
  - From: Thomas Springer