Re: Fedora Project Competetion?

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Fedora Project Competetion?
• From: Michael Schwendt <mschwendt.tmp0501.nospam@xxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 02:31:29 +0200
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 14:22:03 -0700 (PDT), BRUCE STANLEY wrote:

> And since the current release of Centos (4.1) is built from the official
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4  source RPMs, it should be the same version
> as supported by Red Hat.  If it is bad, so is the official RHEL 4 retail
> box version.

Or not, since building src.rpms [and bootable ISO images] can introduce
a range of bugs.

• References:
  • Re: Fedora Project Competetion?
    • From: Les Mikesell
  • Re: Fedora Project Competetion?
    • From: BRUCE STANLEY

• Prev by Date: Re: sound recording
• Next by Date: Re: dual boot fc4 and rawhide
• Previous by thread: Re: Fedora Project Competetion?
• Next by thread: Re: Fedora Project Competetion?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread