On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 12:01:03 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Some of the documentation I have seen seems to suggest > that livna is an official repository, > but I don't think of it that way. Whatever documentation you have read, it explained the situation incorrectly. The infrastructure at livna.org does not belong to the Fedora Project. It's an open 3rd party community project, with some of the contributors supporting both Fedora Extras and rpm.livna.org. What may be at least a bit special, is that at rpm.livna.org it is tried as much as possible to play nice with Core and Extras and not upgrade, rename or replace any packages from Core or Extras. The rare exception being applications, which cannot be extended with plugins, e.g. Audacity. Conflicts shall never happen and would be a bug (http://bugzilla.livna.org). > Am I being too cautious? "Cautious" with regard to what?
