Re: atrpms, gcc, libtool and what did i do wrong?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 12:49:35PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> > Hm, I did the above the minute I wrote the mail. This is fc4-i386, you
> > are pointing smart to a repo that has the updated gcc (like
> > dl.atrpms.net), and have not forgotten the smart update, right?
> >
> > What does smart query gcc return (see below for my output)? You could
> > also try smart upgrade gcc.
> >
> > Loading cache...
> > Updating cache...               ######################################## [100%]
> >
> > gcc-4.0.0-8@i386
> > gcc-4.0.1-4.fc4@i386
> >
> > Saving cache...
> 
> 
> my results (keeping in mind that i'm new to using "smart"):
> 
> # smart query gcc
> Loading cache...
> Updating cache...
> ######################################## [100%]
> 
> gcc-4.0.0-8@i386
> gcc-4.0.1-4.fc4@i386
> 
> 
> # smart upgrade
> Loading cache...
> Updating cache...
> ######################################## [100%]
> 
> Computing transaction...
> No interesting upgrades available.
> # smart upgrade gcc
> Loading cache...
> Updating cache...
> ######################################## [100%]
> 
> Computing transaction...
> No interesting upgrades available.
> #
> 
>   ok, i'm open to suggestions.

This really looks awkward. rpm -q gcc verifies that you are still on
gcc 4.0.0? What does smart install gcc say?

Care to file a bug report at http://smartpm.python-hosting.com/newticket?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpvnUbHgj0VD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux