On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 12:52:59PM -0400, David Cary Hart wrote: > On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 17:39 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > ok, another "yum update" issue. after a recent update, i got a > > > whack of new /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repo files as part of the > > > medley-package-config package, which included a new (and apparently > > > broken) atrpms.repo file. > > > > Sounds like ATrpms is self-destructing ;-) > > Anecdotally, it looks like 30% of the problems on this list are related > to mixed repos. Axel (who contributes much to the community) makes > matters more complicated with proprietary dependencies. What is a "proprietary dependency"??? It sound like having packages depend on non GPL components (well ipw2x00 kmdls do depend on non-GPL'd firmware packages, if that is waht you mean, but I think not). And compatibility problems are certainly not as high as 30%. That's quite an overestimation IMHO. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpEk68CiUqX1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
