matt... if i understand them both, ssl/ipsec are essentially the same thing, ie the ability to create a secure connection between two points... however, the issue with phishing has demonstrated that just having ssl is not enough.. so how is ipsec going to solve something differently than an ssl implementation.. -bruce -----Original Message----- From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Matthew Miller Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 10:18 AM To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: tcp/routing question... On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:15:34AM -0700, bruce wrote: > you miss what i've been getting at.. obviously, if you have a key > (public/private) situation where you have encryption going on between > client/server, the odds of anyone interfering with this situation is pretty > slim.. in fact.. this is what the use of ssl/certs should be doing. No, I *get* what you've been getting at. > so, i need to look at something a little different.. as far as i can tell.. > the real issue comes down to knowing that the site you're talking to, is the > site you really want to talk to.. Exactly. This is one of the key features of IPsec. > solve this effectively/easily/simply, and you'll do a great deal towards > allowing people to be safer... And this is why IPsec is one of the key features of IPv6. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 80 degrees Fahrenheit. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
