Re: Anybody got experience with libvisual?

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Anybody got experience with libvisual?
• From: "Michael A. Peters" <mpeters@xxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 08:02:06 -0700
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 16:14 +0200, Andy Pieters wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> I was wondering if anyone managed to compile the packages 
> libvisual-nebulus-0.1.4 or libvisual-gforce-0.1.0 with taglib version 0.2.0 ?
> 
> They all complain that taglib version requested is 0.1.6 or 0.1.7.
> 
> Aren't upgrades suposed to be 'backwards-compatible'? 

No. Not always.

• References:
  • Anybody got experience with libvisual?
    • From: Andy Pieters

• Prev by Date: Re: how can you verify that the site you get is not a fake?
• Next by Date: RE: how can you verify that the site you get is not a fake?
• Previous by thread: Anybody got experience with libvisual?
• Next by thread: Need advice on new mailserver and spam
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread