Re: OOO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 15:55 -0500, Jeff Vian wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 19:36 +0200, Fernando Fernández Pedraza wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> > 
> > On 5/27/05, David Cary Hart <Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>          
> >         The most recent (1.9.104 ) RPMS provided by OO do include
> >         "base" and seem quite stable.
> > 
> > The latest RPM's do indeed seem stable, but they don't have a
> > "Fedorized" as they where in FC3. Are there any plans to further
> > visually integrate OO in FC4?

> If they work as is and are stable why would anyone _need_ the eye candy
> to make them seem "Fedorized".?  I have not looked at the latest (I am
> waiting for FC4 to be released), but unless there is something visually
> distracting in the official OOo release why is effort needed to change
> it?
> 
I have been using them and they work just fine. I had to manually add
the menus to KDE which is no BFG.
-- 
Multi-RBL Check:         http://www.TQMcube.com/rblcheck.htm
Kill Spam at the Source: http://www.TQMcube.com/spam_trap.htm
Today's Spam Trap Adds:  http://www.TQMcube.com/BlockedToday
RBLDNSD HowTo:           http://www.TQMcube.com/rbldnsd.htm


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux