Am Mo, den 16.05.2005 schrieb Cosme Faria Corrêa um 22:00: > Em Seg, 2005-05-16 às 15:42 -0400, Matthew Miller escreveu: > > On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 09:39:24PM +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > > > I do not agree. > > > > I think it is not a good idea to allow my client see a warning about my > > > > server unavailability. > > > And how do you think you can prevent that without running a HA mail > > > service? > > > > By using a server with a lower MX priority. > > I think it is clear now. > > Buy a service and do not worry about: > > - link down > - server crash > - client complaining on e-mail warning LOL. Nothing is clear, at least to me. See my other reply. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.14_FC2smp Serendipity 22:02:53 up 2 days, 21:34, load average: 0.19, 0.18, 0.17
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
