Re: attack 2

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: attack 2
• From: Richard Crawford <rscrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 21:47:03 -0700
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <000001c555ad$db099a70$6764a8c0@pccat03> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KMail/1.8

On Tuesday 10 May 2005 21:00, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> Exactly my point. I would actually go with the UID>=500 route. Shall we
> file a bug report? No reason why this can't make it in to FC4

I've been curious about that as well.  Also wish I could get Nessus and 
Bastille installed without a hassle.

-- 
Richard S. Crawford
http://www.mossroot.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: attack 2
    • From: Arthur Pemberton
  • Re: attack 2
    • From: jim lawrence

• References:
  • attack 2
    • From: roland brouwers
  • Re: attack 2
    • From: Michael A. Peters
  • Re: attack 2
    • From: Arthur Pemberton

• Prev by Date: Re: OT: What's the deal with Ubuntu?
• Next by Date: Re: how to force a hd check during boot up
• Previous by thread: Re: attack 2
• Next by thread: Re: attack 2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread