Re: HT control

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: HT control
• From: John Mahowald <jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 14:29:41 -0500
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ur/a5rHFwYXWbgiEShts6ttCNbooI4Tdag6QV8NSio+Toweco+Hx4YoVggkz/yXpvHY/uGuqeE8pYXVoKsVebtSWfXuzYn3SHTMYHsWDcFj/+pS01sej1nvrqN01KWg4az+kLOvtzHK7EY4cqM5YW6DVdJ2wqbv+ijsZfypYoUs=
• In-reply-to: <01de01c5518c$a79d43a0$0501a8c0@pclaptop2>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <01de01c5518c$a79d43a0$0501a8c0@pclaptop2>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

I'm not aware of a way, besides using multiple threads/processes to
ensure both have something to run. However, since they are the same
physical CPU, I doubt there would be significant benefit.

• References:
  • HT control
    • From: Kiss Gábor

• Prev by Date: Re: keeping good time
• Next by Date: Re: cron
• Previous by thread: HT control
• Next by thread: Gcc versioning issues
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread