multimedia licensing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: multimedia licensing
From: kwhiskers <kwhiskers@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:13:11 -0600
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=H2JaD7HPxx3bT42CPoZoazTGVNqPOanIFldLJNrh+oU4GKvv1VHJfutXAXU2D9KC7r2HT07z9UgqBuW3W73svxtkeG7wxbzdAntJXzWfoABbqcjfDXZYaHjOu1h3bsW1nzxxpIOtN4rb9hGEs780Y3l4hKyvXbiy6YB7KsNvw5g=
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: kwhiskers <kwhiskers@xxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

I have a question:

Many times I have heard that Fedora cannot be a fully functioning operating system because of licensing constraints.

My question is:

Why are other distributions not plagued by these same constraints? They're all Linux.

I have tried SuSE, Mandrake (now Mandrivel - such an unfortunate christening), Knoppix, and some minor distros.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: multimedia licensing
  - From: Joel Jaeggli
- Re: multimedia licensing
  - From: kwhiskers
- Re: multimedia licensing
  - From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: multimedia licensing
  - From: Jon Savage

Prev by Date: Re: Evolution threading
Next by Date: Re: shorewall and iptables
Previous by thread: grub-install crashes on SATA drive
Next by thread: Re: multimedia licensing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]