Sjoerd Mullender wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >>Hi >> >> >>>>> >>>> >>>>This should be SELINUX=enabled >>>> >>> >>> >>>The comments in /etc/selingux/config and the FAQ both say >>>SELINUX=permissive, and neither one mentions "enabled". The FAQ says to >>>use "permissive" first to check whether there are any problems before >>>taking the plunge. Is "enabled" really correct, because then it's a bug >>>in both the FAQ and the default config file that they are not mentioned. >>> >>> >>> >> >>Yes, Enabled is correct. if you want to suggest improvements to the FAQ >>please file them in bugzilla.redhat.com against the document > > > Then what does "enabled" mean? Is it the same as "permissive" or > "enforcing", or is it something else altogether? If "enforcing", how do > I get "permissive" behavior? > > I'll give it a swing now and see whether this does what I want. Ok, no luck. I don't see any difference between enabled and permissive. sestatus still says SELinux is disabled. Also, there is no mention of an selinuxfs mount in /proc/mounts (which I'd expect based on what's in rc.sysinit). -- Sjoerd Mullender <sjoerd@xxxxxxx>
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
