Re: Sata drives with nforce3 chip set on Motherboard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:27:32 -0500, John Pearson <jpearson42@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 March 2005 09:39 pm, Billy Tallis wrote:
> > This is the right place to ask such questions. I would guess that
> > there are just not any other people with your problem on the list now.
> > The first step would be to submit a bug report about the installation
> > disc. FC4 will probably have the necessary drivers, if that is the
> 
> Thank you very much for taking time to answer.  I did trace down a bug report,
> but it is closed at this point in time.
> 
> In point of fact, if I can download the next update of the the kernel
> 2.6.10-something, then the problem goes away.  Which means to me that if i
> had an iso with the latest revision of kernel, then the system would work.
> and that is why I was wondering about that.
> 
> I loaded FC2 and it had no problem with identifying an ide drive as an ide
> drive.  But it does not support the ethernet chipset on the motherboard
> [sigh].
> 
> However, with the sata drive formated by FC2, the FC3 installer finds it
> without problem.  I did the install of FC3,  but the 2.6.9 kernel panics when
> the handoff arrives.  So...  I am doing a minimum installation on an ide
> drive with FC3.  I will do an immediate kernel update,  rsync the sata drive
> to the ide drive, and then edit grub.conf.  [All of this with my fingers
> crossed. ;-)    Of course, I am open to suggestions, still.
> 
> Thanks again.
> 
> -jp
> 

Since it seems that you will not have a stable system anyways, you
might as well get FC4 test 1 and see if that works. If not, then a bug
should not have been closed or a new one needs to be opened. Good
luck.


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux