Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 11:27 -0800, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:Is there a chance that 1.0-2.fc3 is a later version than 1.0.1-1x, or that the version on the server is more recent but not an fc3 rpm. I notice that the name of the file you show for what is on the server does not include an fc3 identifier.
The Red Hat Network Notification Tool (KDE Applet) tells me correctly that there is a new version of Firefox available. The version on the nachine is firefox-1.0-2.fc3.x86_64.rpm, while the latest version on the server is firefox-1.0.1-1.3.1.x86_64.rpm. Nevertheless, up2date doesn't report the new version as available for installation.
Does anyone know why this is? Is the new firefox worth hand
installation?
