Re: FC 3 -- Ready for Production Deploymnet??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Roger, 

Please don't take a currently running thread and make a new one out of
it.  It is known as 'thread hijacking'.

It is a netiquette issue as well as one that causes major problems
with thread displays for those of us running email clients.

Tim's topic here is not fully resolved and yours is not really related
to the topic at hand.  Just send a new email to fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
and we will follow the new one.

Also FWIW there are a LOT of eyes on these lists so chances are high
that if you post direct and specific questions you will get a
response.  Also sometimes it takes a rephrasing to get the right
person(s) attention, don't take it personally, it's not a big deal.


Cheers
Marc


On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:06:19 -0800, Roger Lin <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am sure the bios is correct, CD is 1, hd-0 is 2 and floppy is 3. I
> disabled other boot device otherwise the drive with Windows would
> boot. Without boot up the Fedora, is there any way I can check for
> what's going on? Sounds to me it tried to boot from the disk and
> failed, where can I check with errors if I can't even boot it up?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Roger
> 
> >
> >---- Original Message ----
> >From: ntbrito@xxxxxxxx
> >To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Re: FC 3 -- Ready for Production Deploymnet??
> >Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:43:58 +0000
> >
> >>perhaps you should check the boot parameters in your bios, sometimes
> >it
> >>happens that we are booting from cd and forget anything else...
> >>
> >>nb
> >>
> >>Roger Lin wrote:
> >>> Last night I have sent an email to this list but no one seems
> >>> noticed. I installed FC3 on a AMC Sempron 2400+, Ecs KT600-A box
> >with
> >>> an WD 80 GB drive, using the DVD iso file, the install run without
> >>> any problem and got to the complete successful screen, but won't
> >boot
> >>> up, got error disk boot falure. Maybe you mean more than ready is
> >not
> >>> for all plat form? This is a brand new box, but Fedora won't even
> >>> boot up...
> >>>
> >>> Apprecaite any help I may get,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Roger
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>---- Original Message ----
> >>>>From: linuxr@xxxxxxxxx
> >>>>To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>Subject: Re: FC 3 -- Ready for Production Deploymnet??
> >>>>Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:44:36 -0500
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Production deployment doing what?  Maybe you can tell us a little
> >>>>
> >>>>bit
> >>>>
> >>>>>more information for what your plans are.  For example, I might
> >run
> >>>>>RHEL for a super-high traffic web server, hosting an ecommerce
> >site
> >>>>>with secure SSL transactions, etc.  I might use Fedora for a
> >local
> >>>>>print server and/or file server.  In my opinion there are lots of
> >>>>
> >>>>uses
> >>>>
> >>>>>like this, that are still in a production environment, and for
> >these
> >>>>>uses I think Fedora is more than ready.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Marc
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:38:17 -0500, Tim Holmes
> >>>>
> >>>><tholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>>Good Morning Folks:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>I have just finished loading my first FC3 box, and the updates
> >are
> >>>>>>running right now.  I will be testing this box for a period of
> >>>>
> >>>>time, but
> >>>>
> >>>>>>what I am wondering is if FC3 is ready for production deployment
> >>>>
> >>>>at this
> >>>>
> >>>>>>point, or if I should wait for a further period of development.
> >>>>
> >>>>We are
> >>>>
> >>>>>>mostly a windows shop, and my normal time table is to not deploy
> >>>>
> >>>>an
> >>>>
> >>>>>>operating system until it has gone through the first service
> >pack
> >>>>>>update, but there are exceptions to this rule.  I am newer to
> >>>>
> >>>>using
> >>>>
> >>>>>>Fedora and I don't have a good time table established for
> >>>>
> >>>>deployment.  I
> >>>>
> >>>>>>have 2 webservers (apache) a database server (MySQL) and a file
> >>>>
> >>>>server
> >>>>
> >>>>>>(samba) currently deployed, as well as a Nagios box, one running
> >>>>
> >>>>cacti
> >>>>
> >>>>>>and one that will be shortly getting mailman
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Your insights and thoughts would be appreciated
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>TIM
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Tim Holmes
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>IT Manager / Webmaster
> >>>>>>Medina Christian Academy
> >>>>>>A Higher Standard...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Jeremiah 33:3
> >>>>>>Jeremiah 29:11
> >>>>>>Esther 4:14
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>--
> >>>>>>fedora-list mailing list
> >>>>>>fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>To unsubscribe:
> >http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--
> >>>>>fedora-list mailing list
> >>>>>fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>To unsubscribe:
> >http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Nelson Brito
> >>http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/ntbrito
> >>
> >>--
> >>fedora-list mailing list
> >>fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >>
> 
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux