Re: migrating 2.4->2.6 & binutils

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: migrating 2.4->2.6 & binutils
• From: Douglas Frank <frank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:10:24 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hmm, sounds like good advice now that you mention it.

On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 14:55 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
> I'd try to avoid using non-RPM-installed programs, especially under 
> /usr, if I was you.

-- 
Douglas Frank    HP Co.
ZKO              110 Spit Brook Rd.       The older I get,
603-884-0501     Nashua, NH USA 03062       the better I was.

• References:
  • migrating 2.4->2.6 & binutils
    • From: Douglas Frank
  • Re: migrating 2.4->2.6 & binutils
    • From: Paul Howarth

• Prev by Date: Yum did not restart bind-chroot.i386 22:9.2.5rc1-1 after update
• Next by Date: Re: Dell Inspiron 510m under FC3
• Previous by thread: Re: migrating 2.4->2.6 & binutils
• Next by thread: Re: migrating 2.4->2.6 & binutils
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread