Re: Problems with rpm database

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:35:30AM -0500, Carl Reynolds wrote:
> William Hooper wrote:
> > Carl Reynolds said:
> > > I just installed Fedora Core 3 x86_64 on a machine and used rpm to get
> > > atrpms-kickcstart for the x86_64 architecture.
> > > When I run
> > > apt-get update

> > Has apt been upgraded to work with Fedora x86_64 yet?

> The rpm I used to install it is 
> http://download.atrpms.net/other/packages/fedora-3-i386/atrpms/atrpms-kickstart-25-1.rhfc3.at.x86_64.rpm
> 
> Since it has x86_64 I guess I assumed it is for the 64 bit Fedora Core 3 
> distribution.

It is and it works like a charm iff you avoid multilib, e.g. remove
all overlapping i386 packages. For servers that don't need openoffice
or HelixPlayer that's not a major loss.

   http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=326
   http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=334

See

   http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=334#c2

for how to make your system "singlelib".
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpR8sNQZFrV8.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux