Re: FC 3 updates...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefan Held wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 03.02.2005, 17:19 -0600 schrieb Thomas Cameron:


If this is unacceptable to you, you might consider their more slow-moving, commercial distribution, Red Hat Enterprise Linux. It costs, but it's very stab;e and doesn't have nearly as many updates as FC does.


Never noticed that Core3 is unstable :-)


Thomas


Beside, i have no problem with this fast updates as long as they do not
implement more bugs than they get out.

Actually the only thing on the whole system that even remotely appears unstable is HAL and mounting CD drives. Apart from that this distro is very stable. Kudos to the programmers of Fedora Core. I've left one distro that I "thought" was stable and very usable because it just simply didn't play nice on my hardware and required more "tweaking" than I wanted to spend time doing. Now I've got 99% of everything I want and need and am free to get work done.


--
Mark
-----------------------------------------------------------
Paid for by Penguins against modern appliances(R)
Linux User Since 1996
Powered by Mandrake Linux 8.2 & RH Fedora Core 3
ICQ# 27816299


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux