Re: Is Fedora Core1 'tooo' old?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Rajev Mhasawade <rcmpost@xxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is Fedora Core1 'tooo' old?
From: David Curry <dsccable@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 14:33:33 -0500
Cc:
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922

Rajev Mhasawade wrote:

Hi Ben, But isnt 2-3 releases of Fedora in a year make users run for updates every now and then?We are used to 3-4 years gap from windows.For those who dont have access to net (TG im not one of them) its more hard. Win98 support is yet available (or needed) unlike Fedora1 which support is ended up :(( I thought i have got latest one when i saw (C) 2004 but shocked to see its past now! Rajev

Fedora Legacy is supporting Fedora Core 1.  See http://fedoralegacy.org/

References:
- Re: Is Fedora Core1 'tooo' old?
  - From: Rajev Mhasawade

Prev by Date: Re: STMP Auth Failure
Next by Date: Re: libmod.so.0
Previous by thread: Re: Is Fedora Core1 'tooo' old?
Next by thread: Re: Is Fedora Core1 'tooo' old?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]