Re: Is Fedora Core1 'tooo' old?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 19:15:55 -0500, Ben Sheron <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I do audio work with Ardour and Jack.  I still use Fedora Core 1 because
> of the fact that I can easily get a good low latency kernel for it via
> the PlanetCCRMA package.  The 2.4 series is better for low latency than
> the 2.6, otherwise I would use FC3.  

someone from the audio group claimed that 2.6.10 was the best so far
regardless this. lwn.net has a article last week on Ingo's(redhat)
scheduler work which might be merged soon. just FYI
-- 
Regards,
Rahul Sundaram


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux