Re: Slightly OT: Greylisting success or failure stories?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 21:59, David Cary Hart wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 20:34 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> > I have been using milter-greylist with Sendmail and I am *incredibly* 
> > impressed.  Between SpamAssassin, spamass-milter, DCC, Pyzor, Razor, ClamAV, 
> > clamav-milter, and milter-greylist, I literally receive no spam in my Inbox. 
> > None.
> > 
> I really dislike adding all that stuff.
> 
> With NONE of the above, using three RBLs and our internal rlbdnsd we
> receive less than one spam per user per week. It's cleaner, faster, far
> more efficient and requires absolutely no maintenance. 

I have found greylisting and spamassassin alone provide almost 100% spam
protection.  I never really cared for using the network checks such as
Razor, Pyzor and the others.  Greylisting requires very little
maintenance as well.  :)
 
-- 
Scot L. Harris
webid@xxxxxxxxxx

The all-softening overpowering knell,
The tocsin of the soul, -- the dinner bell.
		-- Lord Byron 


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux