Re: OT: HTML vs. FTP File Delivery

• To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: OT: HTML vs. FTP File Delivery
• From: "Anthony E. Greene" <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 01:14:24 +0200
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On 0:16 Feb 3, 2005 David Cary Hart <Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What's the conventional wisdom these days on delivering files? On one
> hand it seems more efficient to hand off the transfer from Apache to
> an FTP server. On the other hand, an additional process is running.
>
> Any thoughts?

HTTP 1.1 is more efficient than FTP, and there's less chance of firewall
issues.


--Tony

• References:
  • OT: HTML vs. FTP File Delivery
    • From: David Cary Hart

• Prev by Date: Re: Even Numbered Kernels
• Next by Date: Re: Could an Intel 486 wake up with FC3
• Previous by thread: OT: HTML vs. FTP File Delivery
• Next by thread: Re: OT: HTML vs. FTP File Delivery
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread