-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Robin Laing wrote:
| Rahul Sundaram wrote: | |> Hi |> |>> One of the things that I would like to point out is that FC is a |>> BETA or testing product. |> |> |> |> |> no. its not. while its is used as a basis for RHEL, the previous |> redhat linux releases were too. so nothing has changed in that aspect |> |> |> I would not install it to a production or training environment. I |> would use a more stable distribution in such an environment, such as |> RHEL. |> |> ------ |> |> this is more due to the fast release cycle of fedora and not because |> its a beta product |> | | We use Fedora in production environment with no major headaches. We | run versions ranging from FC1 to FC3 and still have less problems | than that major OS that costs hundreds of dollars (which we have | site licenses for).
Its ok to mention Windows by name, lol
We run FC2 and FC3 in production. The only problems we have had is with a less than perfect 3-ware escallade card. But I can't blame Fedora for that.
Kevin Fries
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCAGAniFq1Eo16+CgRAmQcAJ9SGKcecpHT2xRsuhcDBG2PKggZ9wCfcSAW nWHcX6qtuhWEZIy9PCVJFVY= =2hE3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
