Re: FC3 sucks. It takes up too much memory!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Vian wrote:
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 08:29 -0700, Robin Laing wrote:

Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote:

James Mckenzie wrote:

James McKenzie
A Proud User of Linux!

What will it take for Sun to really look into their Linux (and Solaris for that matter) JavaVM. Currently the best performing JavaVM is the one for Microsoft systems and it is not even written by Sun!! (the Microsft JavaVM)


What do you men "best performing"?.  speed?, quality?, features?, or
exactly what are you defining this as?

I don't use anything but the Sun VM so I can't compare. However, I am
very satisfied with what I get.


But it isn't to the Java Standard. MS lost the court battle over this one.


IIRC, not only did M$ lose the battle about code rights, they have
deviated greatly from the java standards.  Thus any code written to use
their vm and it's features is likely to fail to function correctly on a
vm that complies with the standards.

The best bet is to use the JRE package from Sun and be certain that all
the code it runs is compliant with standards.  Any java programs that do
not work with the Sun vm are likely not standards compliant.



As all those Web designers are starting to find out that based their designs on the MS VM, now that it isn't being shipped with Windows. I have come across a few sites that are this way.


--
Robin Laing


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux