Re: Apache 2.0 Problem

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Apache 2.0 Problem
• From: Markku Kolkka <markkuk@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:49:53 +0200
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KMail/1.7.1

Hugo Rebello kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika torstai, 27. 
tammikuuta 2005 15:31):
> Sorry, but What is W3C compliant ?

Compatible with standards published by the World Wide Web 
Consortium: http://www.w3.org/

> How can I get this file 
> compliant with W3C ?

Check it with the validator: http://validator.w3.org/ and fix any 
errors.

-- 
 Markku Kolkka
 markku.kolkka@xxxxxx

• References:
  • Re: Apache 2.0 Problem
    • From: James Mckenzie
  • Re: Apache 2.0 Problem
    • From: Hugo Rebello

• Prev by Date: Re: Why I think FC3 sucks!
• Next by Date: Re: creating a sysv script
• Previous by thread: Re: Apache 2.0 Problem
• Next by thread: RE: Apache 2.0 Problem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread