Re: yum horror

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 10:06:15PM +0100, Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 11:48:48AM -0600, Brian Fahrlander wrote:
> >>On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 18:23 +0100, Marcel Janssen wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>When trying yum with ATrpms, I find that dependencies get not resolved 
> >>>and this makes yum almost unusable.
> >>>
> >>>Is there a fix ?

> >You won't blame the food if the spoon is broken, or will you? ;)
> >
> >The packages are fine, yum is having some trouble
> >
> >http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=289
> >http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=290
> >
> >At least some of the bugs are said to be fixed by the latest released
> >yum. You can also try apt/up2date and if you are willing to use a very
> >promising resolver in beta stadium go smart! :)
> >
> > 
> >
> >>and I've been right where you are...which is why I just don't use it
> >>anymore.  Google the wars and rumors of wars...but don't bother.
> >>   
> >>
> >
> >You mean the wars against bugs? ;)
> >
> > 
> >
> >>   The "AT" there might be lower case, instead...you get the idea.
> >>   
> >>
> Hmm... I'm using apt-get and I've had the same troubles with the 
> .at-packages
> smartpm did solve it - to a certain extent - but right now I'm 
> downgrading from .at-packages to packages more easy-going on my system.
> It may be the spoon which is the problem, but if all spoons are 
> broken,the soup may be too strongly flavoured :P  (sorry for that one)

Can you provide an example of troubles in apt land? The only one known
to me is yum itself.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpkcsoVboyUg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux