On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Dave Jones wrote: > On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 01:49:25PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Monday 27 December 2004 11:46, Dave Jones wrote: > > >On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 03:27:58PM +0100, Thomas Skybakmoen wrote: > > > > Will it be part of next Fedora or updated from 2.6.9 in 3? > > > > I want to se this apart of RHEL 4 since it has quite a bugfix > > > > list and some new hardware and bsd runlevels- wich I hope can be > > > > active. > > > > > >There's a merge to 2.6.10 already in CVS. > > >I'll do a build sometime in the next few days for rawhide. > > >FC2/FC3 will stick on 2.6.9 for a while, whilst the rough > > >edges of 2.6.10 have been polished off. > > > > > > Dave > > > > Pay attention to samba things > > I wonder if thats the missing part of the security hole fix that > we carried in the -ac patch on which our 2.6.9 kernels were based. > It'll likely go out with 2.6.10-acX when I get around to building > it anyway, so if that is the case, we'll pick that bit back up. > > > , and to amanda things in 2.6.10 Dave, > > That I hadn't heard about. Make sure upstream (linux-kernel) > hears about these problems too. Unheard problems go unfixed. I had filed 142745 (against Amanda) and I just filed 143803 (against kernel) in RH's Bugzilla to track the Amanda issue. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
