Re: Why no /proc/config.gz on FC-3 kernel?

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Why no /proc/config.gz on FC-3 kernel?
• From: John Summerfield <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:40:16 +0800
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KMail/1.7

On Monday 29 November 2004 10:25, Dag Wieers wrote:
> ell, I can imagine the situation that Fedora has already upgraded your
> kernel (read: replaced) and some clever mechanisme needs the kernel config
> to dynamically build a module for your current kernel. (DKMS?)

With the same version number? If so, yuou have serious management issues to 
sort out.


-- 
Cheers
John

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why no /proc/config.gz on FC-3 kernel?
    • From: Dag Wieers

• References:
  • Why no /proc/config.gz on FC-3 kernel?
    • From: Timothy Murphy
  • Re: Why no /proc/config.gz on FC-3 kernel?
    • From: Dave Jones
  • Re: Why no /proc/config.gz on FC-3 kernel?
    • From: Dag Wieers

• Prev by Date: Re: New Technology, Auto resolution
• Next by Date: Re: Mail Server
• Previous by thread: Re: Why no /proc/config.gz on FC-3 kernel?
• Next by thread: Re: Why no /proc/config.gz on FC-3 kernel?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread