Re: [SECURITY] Fedora Core 2 Update: httpd-2.0.51-2.9

• To: Jeremy Rosengren <jeremy.rosengren@xxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Fedora Core 2 Update: httpd-2.0.51-2.9
• From: Joe Orton <jorton@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:16:56 +0000
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• Mail-followup-to: Jeremy Rosengren <jeremy.rosengren@xxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 04:08:56PM -0600, Jeremy Rosengren wrote:
> I'm curious, why wouldn't FC2 get 2.0.52?  Considering FC2 had 2.0.49
> at release and has since been upgraded to 2.0.51, is there some
> specific reason not to push 2.0.52 out to FC2 updates?

No specific reason, no, just a lack of time.  There might be a 2.0.52
update later on.

joe

• References:
  • Re: [SECURITY] Fedora Core 2 Update: httpd-2.0.51-2.9
    • From: Jeremy Rosengren

• Prev by Date: Re: PHP-4.3.9-3 Recompile Fails
• Next by Date: Re: Need a sniffer/password capture to prove telnet is bad
• Previous by thread: Re: [SECURITY] Fedora Core 2 Update: httpd-2.0.51-2.9
• Next by thread: cd player problem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread