Re: Should I have an RPM installed twice? (x86_64-related??)

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Should I have an RPM installed twice? (x86_64-related??)
• From: "C. Linus Hicks" <lhicks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 02:59:59 -0500
• In-reply-to: <1101281786.4111.13.camel@obelisk>
• References: <1101281786.4111.13.camel@obelisk>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 07:36 +0000, Nigel Tao wrote:
> I seem to have the "gnome-vfs2" package installed twice:
> ntao:~ rpm -q gnome-vfs2
> gnome-vfs2-2.8.2-8
> gnome-vfs2-2.8.2-8

They are probably different architectures. Try this:

rpm -q gnome-vfs2 --qf %{NAME}-%{ARCH}\\n

The 32-bit arch file is the one that is missing, so you could try re-
installing it.

-- 
C. Linus Hicks <lhicks@xxxxxxxxx>

• References:
  • Should I have an RPM installed twice? (x86_64-related??)
    • From: Nigel Tao

• Prev by Date: Re: Should I have an RPM installed twice? (x86_64-related??)
• Next by Date: Re: LCD screen resolution problem
• Previous by thread: Re: Should I have an RPM installed twice? (x86_64-related??)
• Next by thread: mc doesnt work over ssh
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread