On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 09:24 -0500, Mark Bradford wrote: > I have been using apt for installs and updating/upgrading, but am > noticing most of the conversation here seems to favor yum. Is there any > significant difference between the two, or are there any issues or > conflicts in using both? FC3 repositories seem to be dropping apt support, and apt does not handle multi-arch (i386 vs x86_64, PPC, ...). Has been some talk of an apt version able to use the new yum repository meta-data, but so far seems to be vaporware. I've pretty much dropped apt in favor of yum, but apt/synaptic still seem viable for FC2 and earlier. Phil
