Re: Pine?

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Pine?
• From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 05:43:49 +0530
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=gKnCO03Ix3p0npInyULqW3wjAtiY1489x7WG3S0vhGr8CRUjYEXSbwGZY+jqvwNx+ptP8zXaieOzkLw+kZiLYJ/8brSsMiQjqnS6ZIXdNGRAvJT5Nb2CCvPY4hjxn8qXURKfLNm6SehH/+PItAdA0gSUDoBB0LIsyj9RgaRIc1k=
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi


> UW's liscense is gpl incompatable... It was actually removed in fc2...
> Personally I use pine, but I can understand why it's not in the base
> distro.


it has been deemed non free. the replacement is called mutt and there
is a nano editor available which acts pretty much the same

-- 
Regards,
Rahul Sundaram

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Pine?
    • From: John Summerfield
  • Re: Pine?
    • From: Paul Tomblin

• References:
  • Pine?
    • From: Paul Tomblin
  • Re: Pine?
    • From: Joel Jaeggli

• Prev by Date: Re: Pine?
• Next by Date: Re: ptrace fixed kernel
• Previous by thread: Re: Pine?
• Next by thread: Re: Pine?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread