Re: FC3 mediacheck

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 13 November 2004 09:02, Jim Cornette wrote:
>Erik Hemdal wrote:
>>>>>md5sum -c MD5SUM
>>>>>
>>>>>I've already indicated this once. After successful MD5SUM check
>>>>> - boot with 'linux ide=nodma' and then do the MediaCheck.)
>>
>> I think this comment was from Satish about ide=nodma.  Why is that
>> necessary?  I've encountered the mediacheck failures similarly for
>> the first time ever.  If the drive operates normally, why do we
>> need nodma in order to check only disk2 and disk3 of the CD set?
>>
>> I'm not intending this as disrespectful to anyone; I'm truly
>> curious about it.  Out of the four install images, all four pass
>> the MD5 checksum test, and two out of four pass the mediacheck. 
>> On my CD writer, cdrecord reports that the buffer was always
>> adequately filled and burnfree protection was never needed.  So
>> assuming the integrity of the media is OK (seems to be, since
>> cdrecord reports no errors and the CD is readable), I'd suspect a
>> problem with the original ISO image. Whether you use DMA or not on
>> your drive doesn't seem to have any bearing on things....else
>> other I/O would have trouble too.
>>
>> Am I missing something?
>>
>> Erik
>
>Check the fedora-test-list for discussions regarding the mediacheck
>failure. Padding the discs with at least 150 kb was suggested,
> loading the ide-scsi or using the 2.4 kernel was suggested. I guess
> there is some breakage which happened with the change to the 2.6
> kernel.
>
>I'm glad that adding ide=nodma to the installer before a mediacheck
>works to verify the discs successfully. This also probably helps
> ensure more reliable installs with systems that show the mediacheck
> false result during verifying.
>
>I feared a mass explosion of coasters because of this problem and no
>reference to the problem within the release notes. For those reading
>this list, the coaster collection is probably lower.
>For installers not on the list and attempting an install, the
> mirrors, reburning discs multiple times and giving up on the
> release might be at higher levels.
>
>Jim

After having a hell of a time getting them, I burnt all 9 disks 
yesterday usng k3b from a konstuct built kde3.3 install, makeing k3b 
verify the burns, using kernel 2.6.10-rc1-bk20.  dma is enabled and 
the minimum buffer fill during any of the burns at about 32x was 98%.

Perhaps something has sneaked into the distribution kernel that 
doesn't need to be there?

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.28% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux