Am Do, den 28.10.2004 schrieb Beartooth um 21:34: > >> rpm --import http://www.fedoralegacy.org/FEDORA-LEGACY-GPG-KEY > > > > Fedora Legacy has nothing to do with rpm.livna.org. > > That's news; good thing I asked. From what did you previously conclude it to be different? The Fedora Legacy Project took over the responsibility for the Fedora _Core_ 1 packages for keeping them secure by providing bugfixing updates. > > Why don't you read the clear instructions at http://rpm.livna.org? > > --> GPG key > > Why don't you read my .sig? Because they're utterly incomprehensible, > except maybe to Alpha Plus Nerds. I'm only a poor retired professor and > professional explicator of texts. > > Or do you go out of your way to be as nasty to the less informed as you > can manage? This is certainly by no means the first time you've done it to > me. > > If there were 10% more people like Alexander, the public for all of linux > would soon become negligible. He should confine himself to what > he's minimally competent at -- meaning, apparently , talking to Einstein. Sorry if you feel offended by my answer. But isn't the first point to start when deciding to use a specific repository to read the instructions on it's main site? I would think so. That has little to do with skills or experience with and knowledge about Linux in general or Fedora in detail. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.8-1.521smp Serendipity 22:01:37 up 8 days, 18:41, load average: 0.24, 0.29, 0.27
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
