Re: OpenOffice update fails - bad gpg

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: OpenOffice update fails - bad gpg
• From: David Cary Hart <Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:27:46 -0400
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <12830379.1098797466153.JavaMail.root@skeeter.psp.pas.earthlink.net> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 13:16, Clint Harshaw wrote:

> But aren't there some things we'd miss by not using the OO that is 
> specifically tuned for FC?
> 
No. I don't think so. In fact, the RPM does not include java support  -
the oo installer does. Plus the latest rpm is not the current version of
oo.

> ...just curious.
> 
> Clint

• References:
  • Re: OpenOffice update fails - bad gpg
    • From: James Mckenzie
  • Re: OpenOffice update fails - bad gpg
    • From: David Cary Hart
  • Re: OpenOffice update fails - bad gpg
    • From: Clint Harshaw

• Prev by Date: Re: OpenOffice update fails - bad gpg
• Next by Date: Re: How are fedora kernels modified from vanilla kernels
• Previous by thread: Re: OpenOffice update fails - bad gpg
• Next by thread: Security....
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread