On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 17:12, Phillip T. George wrote: > Hello all, > > Made a new topic, because there's so many replies to the other post, I > didn't know which one to reply to. It seems to me that in Tulsa, OK the > choice to go with is Cox cable. Its possible that the phone lines just > aren't up to par or there's some other reason as to why DSL is not very > good. > If anyone in the Texas area uses cable instead of DSL, please reply and > let us know how your service has been (especially if you have used DSL > before). I'd like to see the comparison of someone who has firsthand > experience at both. Like I said, in my area (Tulsa, OK), Cox cable seems > to be a much better choice. Most of our customers don't even know where > the Cable modem is, where as with our customers that have DSL (cheaper, of > course) know EXACTLY where their DSL modem is at :) > > -Phillip You might try dslreports: http://www.dslreports.com/psearch to find out what ISPs have positive and negative feedback in your area. Nathan Kaderavek
