Re: NTP syncing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 Nifty Hat Mitch shaped the electronis to say:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 08:31:12PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
[ Various Verizon-related conversation deleted. ]
Starting locally on the primary traceroute list, I finally hit
one on the 17th hop but its a:
stratum 16, offset 0.062642, root distance 0.006480

Not a problem ... if you traceroute to other 'interesting' places you will get a different list of routers. With a bit of attention you can discover what is close to you.

We've got a T1 from one of Verizon's competitors - Cavalier Telephone. All three of their routers upstream from me provided NTP service.


     remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
==============================================================================
-64.83.60.101.ds 192.5.41.40      2 u   94  128  377    4.681  -91.131  16.643
xatm0-1-0-401-ds 192.5.41.40      2 u   99  128  377   13.307    4.671  48.380
+pos0-2-oc3.core 192.5.41.40      2 u  103  128  377   13.582  -85.782  30.839

The delay from Cavtel's NTP servers was an order of magnitude in lower delay than than clock.redhat.com and the closest cavtel server has one-twentieth of the delay of getting to washington.edu for me.

I'm not sure if its real or not, but it certainly seemed I was syncing time faster after adding these to my config.

--
</chris>

There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies.
-- C.A.R. Hoare




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux