On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 16:43, Kyle Maxwell wrote: > On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:39:56 -0700, Mike McMullen > <mlm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Under FC1 with our load on a system with 512MB of memory it was > > > not unusual to see 35MB to 100MB of swap utilized. Under FC2 > > > it is 0. > > > > > > The system seems to perform a little fast than FC2 did. Every once and > > > a while it slows to a crawl then speeds up again. This usually happens > > > when memory intensive apps like SpamAssassin kick in. Never doing > > > these periods do I see any swap used at all. > > > > > That should be the system seems to perform a little faster than FC1. > > Just curious what the output of "free -m" shows. I think there were > some VM improvements in the kernel, which is where that really should > show up. Have you turned off any other processes that occupied memory > space when you ran FC1 but not now? > After running for over a week since last boot, with FC2, 512mb ram and 1gb swap and a load average of 2+ my system is only using 62mb of swap. I do not recall ever seeing it higher than that since I loaded FC2.
