On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 06:45, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Am Samstag, den 11.09.2004, 19:26 +1000 schrieb Colin Charles: > [...] > > > Also, since Fedora Core is at the cutting edge of development, should we > > be wasting developer time on backporting Evo 2.0 for FC2, when we can > > make it better for FC3? > > > > Of course, if you or anyone else would like to take on such a task, > > there's always room for such thing > > Sometimes I think this is something we need. IMHO there are a lot of > people that like to use/try/beta-test new program versions but don't > want the use rawhide. I'm sometimes one of those cause the downloads are > to heavy for me at home cause I have a volume based Internet account. > > [skipping some length description with details, pro and contra arguments > and the description on the current situation (people.redhat.com, new kde > version at kde.org and so forth). If there is interest in this I can > post these sort of things, but I think we should discuss this then > directly at fedora-devel] > > I would volunteer to do such "backporting" from rawhide to current Core- > Version, but currently fedora has no place for this and I don't want to > open an own repository ;-) I brought this on fedora-devel some months > ago, but there was not much interest then. Maybe we should wait for the > new build-system and bring it on topic then again. > -- > Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> I thought "rawhide" was replaced with "development". The mirrors I have been using don't even have a rawhide dir anymore. What mirror can one fine the 2.0 evolution beta rpms and srpms? Ted
