[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FC1 ghostscript update requires gdk-pixbuf and gtk+?

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: FC1 ghostscript update requires gdk-pixbuf and gtk+?
From: Andreas Mueller <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:12:55 +0200
In-reply-to: <20040818160237.GA7283@strw.leidenuniv.nl>
References: <200408181716.47953@andreas-mueller.com> <20040818160237.GA7283@strw.leidenuniv.nl>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.7

David Jansen wrote:
> checking on /usr/bin/gs shows no dependency on gtk+ :
> $ ldd /usr/bin/gsx
[...]
>         libgtk-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0 (0x0015a000)
>         libgdk-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk-1.2.so.0 (0x00d07000)
Both are provided by gtk+.
[...]
> So removing the duplicate /usr/bin/gsx and removing the requirement
> in the .spec file could resolve this packaging bug. Or am I
> overlooking something?
>
> David Jansen

Andreas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FC1 ghostscript update requires gdk-pixbuf and gtk+?
  - From: David Jansen

References:
- Re: FC1 ghostscript update requires gdk-pixbuf and gtk+?
  - From: Andreas Mueller
- Re: FC1 ghostscript update requires gdk-pixbuf and gtk+?
  - From: David Jansen

Prev by Date: Re: crontab problems, was (no subject)
Next by Date: Re: k3b-mp3 update fails
Previous by thread: Re: FC1 ghostscript update requires gdk-pixbuf and gtk+?
Next by thread: Re: FC1 ghostscript update requires gdk-pixbuf and gtk+?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Home] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Singles Community] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]