Terry Linhardt said: [snip] > Look, I was suggesting something for consideration. The rationale is > that many individuals don't care to get "entangled" in SELinux at this > time. There are plenty of other things to be tested. Now, I'll accept that > the case can be made that the configuration can be readily changed via a > drop-down box, and an individual should know what they are doing when they > accept a "default" (which is to implement SELinux). However, my sense is > that when something is implemented which requires some different admin > techniques then the default should be to "not implement." One would hope that someone choosing to install a test release would do the research to know what they are doing. :-) The best way to get something widely tested it to make it the default. The more SELinux gets tested the better it will get. -- William Hooper
