Re: Firewall configuration for gnomemeeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 02:51:29PM -0500, Jeff Vian wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 13:41, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> > >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Fernandes Macedo <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > 
> >     >> 
> >     Pedro> Then she can use netmeeting (comes with windows , at least
> >     Pedro> in windows xp) and you use gnomemeeting.. If you have a
> >     Pedro> firewall , you'll need to punch a few holes through
> >     Pedro> it... (I say few , but one of them is huge.. It means
> >     Pedro> opening udp ports from 5000 to 65000)
> > 
> > You ARE joking aren't you? That's 60,000 ports!
> > It would take me a year to type all that lot in!
> > Isn't there a way to limit which ports it uses?
> > -- 
> > Colin Paul Adams
> > Preston Lancashire
> > 
> 
> Pedro,
> Why do you need that much open?.
> Iptables, with using statefull rules allows established/related ports to
> be opened.  Would not the other port(s) be related to the initial
> contact port and thus fit these rules?
> 
> An example of what I mean is ftp.  Control connection is on port 21, and
> I do not need to list the data port as it is "related" so it is
> automatically allowed.  It seems netmeeting or gnomemeeting should work
> similarly. I have not tried this but it seems logical.

The L7 match filters are the best bet for handling p2p packets. Check for
the latest revs on freshmeat.net


-- 
Jack Bowling
mailto: jbinpg@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux