Re: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:57:35 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040519)

Ow Mun Heng wrote:

Guys,
Not sure if its Me, but FC2 seems slower to response compared to my old RH9 install.

You're not the only one. The most of the GUI oss projects have put more effort in adding features than memory conservation or speed tests.

Note that I said "more effort" not that there was none, or that it isn't a concern to many.

References:
- FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
  - From: Ow Mun Heng

Prev by Date: Re: problem with the panel
Next by Date: RE: Another sendmail relaying problem.
Previous by thread: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
Next by thread: Re: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]