Re: problem with cdrecord / Fedora Core 2 (/dev/sg*)

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: problem with cdrecord / Fedora Core 2 (/dev/sg*)
• From: Tristan Fillmore <tfillmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 13:26:31 -0700
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 18:54, Gregory Pittman wrote:
> My understanding is that it's not broken at all....it's simplified. You 
> don't have to do the whole -scanbus thing anymore. My SCSI writer works 
> with dev=/dev/cdrom

Running cdrecord with "--help" clearly states that '-scanbus' will scan
the SCSI and IDE buses.  If it's intentional that it now only scans IDE
buses, then at the very least this message should be changed.


Tristan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: problem with cdrecord / Fedora Core 2 (/dev/sg*)
    • From: Phil Schaffner

• References:
  • problem with cdrecord / Fedora Core 2 (/dev/sg*)
    • From: weha
  • Re: problem with cdrecord / Fedora Core 2 (/dev/sg*)
    • From: Tristan Fillmore
  • Re: problem with cdrecord / Fedora Core 2 (/dev/sg*)
    • From: Gregory Pittman

• Prev by Date: Re: cpuspeed usage
• Next by Date: Re: fedora core 2 sore spots
• Previous by thread: Re: problem with cdrecord / Fedora Core 2 (/dev/sg*)
• Next by thread: Re: problem with cdrecord / Fedora Core 2 (/dev/sg*)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread