Am Mo, den 24.05.2004 schrieb Roland Wolters um 01:12: > You are right, sure, I've read it, but you can found something similar at > freshrpms.net, and dag has a similar philosophie, too, I think. > I was confused cause some people talk about fedora.us as a third party repo, > and some people talk about as a extra, but official repo. http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraUsersFAQ That should answer your questions. Not that hard to find ;) > And whats about the fereshrpms, dag, and so on? In some forums there are some > discussions about the incompatibilitys of some packages from some repos (for > example: many people report that freshrpm packages are not compatible with > the packages of fedora.us/livna). So who made the failure there? That is certainly a terrain where the combatants get quickly in hot temper. I intend to keep out of such fights. But it is a fact, that mixing some repositories can cause you "conflicts" (yes Michael, I have your reply to my posting in mind). The question on which side there is a failure may be better handed to the repository maintainers. > Confused, Roland not lucky with the current situation either, Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2188.nptl Sirendipity 16:04:00 up 1 day, 22:00, load average: 1.45, 1.45, 1.33 [ ÎÎÏÎÎ Ï'ÎÏÏÎÎ - gnothi seauton ] my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
